注册 登录  
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭







2015-12-03 02:39:01|  分类: 环境与健康 |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |

After water, gas, and electricity,wireless has become the fourth utility. Everything is being ‘wified’ to death.  Phones, watches, TVs, iPads, DVD players, coffee machines, refrigerators, you name it!


Even schools, hospitals, businesses and coffee shops have WiFi – it’s literally everywhere. In fact, some would say, ‘we can’t live without it.’ But what if wireless was not as safe as we are led to believe?

甚至学校、医院、商业和咖啡店都有WiFi - 这是真的无处不在。事实上,有些人会说,“我们的生活不能没有它。” 但如果无线不安全我们被引导去相信吗?

Do you know what the experts say about wireless technology and your health? 你知道专家说的无线技术和你的健康是什么意思吗?

Wireless devices emit radio frequency radiation or microwave radiation at the rate of billions of cycles per second. Thousands of peer-reviewed studies point to the link between these exposures and a long list of adverse biological health effects and very serious diseases, including brain tumors, cancer and cardiovascular disease.


Of course there are safety guidelines, but do these guidelines protect us?  Absolutely not!  You see, that’s because scientists and engineers are being relied upon to set exposure limits not biologists or medically qualified professionals.

当然还有安全准则,但这些准则保护我们吗? 绝对不是! 你看,这是因为要依靠科学家和工程师要设置曝露限度而不是生物学家或资质的专业人员。

In the United States the safety guidelines for wireless are set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC has various responsibilities. They oversee the allotment of broadcast frequencies across the spectrum, they mediate competition between service providers, they maintain communications in emergencies and they punish celebrities and other people who swear on the radio or take their clothes off on TV.


But the FCC was never supposed to look after your health; it’s not their job. The FCC relies on scientists, engineers and organizations (including the IEEE) to set its ‘proper exposure limits’ – and the doctors are never given an opportunity to offer an opinion.

但是FCC从来就不应该照顾你的健康,这不是他们的工作。FCC依靠科学家、工程师和组织(包括IEEE)设置其“适当的接触限度” — 医生们从来没有提出意见的机会。

Current ‘safety’ guidelines don’t take into account the adverse biological effects of EMF exposures 当前的安全导则没有考虑电磁场暴露不利的生物效应

The current FCC guidelines only take into account the thermal effects of these wireless exposures they fail to take into account the adverse biological effects. What this means is that if the exposures aren’t cooking you, they are safe. But the studies detail thousands of adverse biological effects which occur at levels well below that required to heat tissue.


Here’s the blunt truth: EMF exposure guidelines are based on outdated science.


The FCC requires that all wireless communications devices sold in the United States meet its minimum guidelines for safe human exposure to radio frequency (RF) energy. These guidelines are backed up by the Telecommunications Act (TCA) of 1996 – which is nearly 20 years old.

联邦通信委员会(FCC)要求所有在美国出售的无线通信设备满足其最低人体接触射频(RF)能量的安全指南。这些指南支持1996年电信法案(TCA) — 这有近20年的历史了。

In terms of advances in digital technology, 20 years is a very long time ago. There has been no review of the matter by the FCC despite massive changes in technology and consumer behavior.


As Amy O’Hair of StopSmartMeters.org explains, “established in the 1970s based on 1950s science, and firmed up in the Telecommunications Act (TCA) of 1996, (just as cellular networks were going up), the guidelines have not been reviewed since then – even as usage patterns have changed drastically”.

正如StopSmartMeters.org的Amy O’Hair解释说,“根据基于1950年代科学于1970年代建立的,并确定的1996年电信法案(TCA),(就像蜂窝网络正在上升涨),自此之后指南就没有复审过 — 即使使用模式有了巨大的变化”。

Accumulated radiation exposure levels may be more than 100 times higher than official exposure limits 累积的辐射暴露水平可能超过100倍的官方接触限度

The current guidelines specify exposure limits for hand-held wireless devices in terms of the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). The SAR is a measure of the rate that radio frequency (RF) radiation is absorbed by the body.


For exposure to RF radiation from wireless devices, the allowable FCC SAR limit is 1.6 watts per kilogram (W/kg), as averaged over one gram of tissue. All wireless devices sold in the U.S. have to be approved by the FCC to ensure that they do not exceed the maximum allowable SAR level when operating at the device’s highest possible power level.

对于暴露在无线设备下的射频辐射,允许的FCC SAR极限是1.6瓦特/千克(W /公斤),作为平均超过一克的组织。在美国出售的所有无线设备, 在设备的最高可能的功率下操作时必须通过FCC认可以确保他们不超过最大允许SAR水平

In truth this guideline does very little to protect us because it fails to take into account that most people today are exposed to multiple wireless radiation exposures.


Let’s get real: Many people now have wireless connectivity with not only their phone but also their laptop, watch and tablet, to name a few. In addition, many people live in proximity to a very large number of actively transmitting WiFi routers, smart meters and other wireless devices.


So, in reality, accumulated radiation exposure levels may be more than 100 times higher than official exposure limits – particularly in places like schools and offices.

所以,在现实中累积的辐射水平可能超过100倍官方接触限度 — 特别是在学校和办公室。

Tips on how to take action and safeguard your health 如何采取行动和维护你的健康

Here are some simple steps you can take to safeguard your health from wireless radiation and other electromagnetic field exposures:


  • Replace your wireless devices with wired versions – replace wireless DECT phones and wireless modems with wired versions.
  • 使用有线版本取代你的无线设备 — 使用有线版本取代有线DECT手机和无线调制解调器。

  • Practice safe cell phone use – distance is your friend, avoid using your cell phone next to your ear.
  • 使用安全的手机 — 距离是你的朋友,避免在你的耳朵旁边使用你的手机。

  • Create a low EMF sleep sanctuary where you sleep – rid your bedroom of all electrical devices.
  • 在你睡眠的地方创建一个低EMF睡眠避难所 - 消除你的卧室的所有电气设备。

  • Measure the EMF readings in your home with a simple to use EMF meter. Here is a review of an EMF meter that measures radio frequency radiation and magnetic fields.
  • 在家里用一个简单的EMF计测量EMF读数。这是一个EMF计测量射频辐射和磁场的回顾。

Time for change: The FCC guidelines need updating now 是时候改变了: FCC导则现在需要更新

Clearly the FCC guidelines need updating, here are some suggestions:

1. The regulations need to take into account the biological effects of these exposures not just the heating effect.
2. FCC regulations should be based on the maximum power of each transmitting wireless device based on the number of wireless devices in proximity.
3. In places such as schools and businesses all wireless devices should have automatic maximum power reduction based capability based on the number of wireless devices in proximity.

We need to spread the word about these issues because, ultimately, if the public remains unaware – nothing can improve.

About the author: Lloyd Burrell is the founder of ElectricSense.com. His website offers solutions to the growing number of people whose health is being compromised by exposure to wireless and similar technologies. Download his free EMF Health Report today!


阅读(83)| 评论(0)
推荐 转载




<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->


网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2018